G.V. Artemenko, AGE OF THE HANNIVKA GRANITE (MIDDLE-DNIEPER MEGABLOCK OF THE UKRAINIAN SHIELD)

https://doi.org/10.15407/mineraljournal.44.04.073

UDC 552.43: 550.42:550.93 (477): 549

AGE OF THE HANNIVKA GRANITE (MIDDLE-DNIEPER

MEGABLOCK OF THE UKRAINIAN SHIELD)

G.V. Artemenko, DrSc (Geology), Prof., Head of Department

M.P. Semenenko Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation of the NAS of Ukraine

34, Acad. Palladin Ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03142

E-mail: regulgeo@gmail.com; orcid: 0000-0002-4528-6853 

L.V. Shumlyanskyy, DrSc (Geology), Senior Research Fellow, Leading Researcher

Curtin University, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences

GPO Box U1987, Perth, Australia, WA 6845

M.P. Semenenko Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation of the NAS of Ukraine

34, Acad. Palladin Ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03142

E-mail: leonid.shumlyanskyy@curtin.edu.au; orcid: 0000-0001-5591-5169 

I.A. Shvaika, PhD (Geology), Research Fellow

M.P. Semenenko Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation of the NAS of Ukraine

34, Acad. Palladin Ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03142

E-mail: ishvaika@gmail.com; orcid: 0000-0001-9585-4380 

V.K. Butyrin, Leading Engineer, State enterprise "Pivdenukrgeologiya"

11, Chernyshevsky Str., Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

E-mail: bvaler83@gmail.com; orcid: 0000-0002-5597-5177 

Language: Ukrainian

Mineralogical journal 2022, 44 (4): 73-83

Abstract: The Middle-Dnieper megablock, which is a fragment of the craton, differs from other cratons found on Earth. This is because of the large variety of granitoids (Tokiv, Mokro-Moskowka, and Demuryne complexes) in the former that were formed after the Mesoarchean TTG. Thus, the Middle-Dnieper megablock is important for studying the genesis and geodynamic formation conditions of Late Archaean granitoids. The granitoids in the Middle-Dnieper megablock are not well understood. They include the Hannivka granites of the East Hannivka monocline of the Kryvyi Rih-Kremenchuk structure, whose age and stratigraphic position has been a matter of a long-standing debate. The purpose of the work is to study the geochemistry, genesis and U-Pb age of the Hannivka granites. Based on our results, the Hannivka granites possibly formed in the crust resulting from the melting of older rocks. They differ from other Late Archean granitoids of the Middle-Dnieper megablock by their high U (56.4 ppm) content and the presence of Mo (4.3 ppm). The Hannivka granites underwent tectonic reworking during a collisional event about 2.0 billion years ago, which is probably associated with the kalishpatization of these rocks. The U-Pb age of the cores of zircons sampled from the Hannivka granites, determined by LA-ICP-MS method, are about 2827±16 million years in age. Younger rims probably formed during kalishpatization. The Hannivka granites are the same age as the granitoids of the Mokro-Moskowka and Tokiv complexes. Late Archean granitoids were formed between 2.99-2.7 Ga in the Middle-Dnieper granite-greenstone block and in the geologically similar granite-greenstone block KMA are 2.6 Ga in age. In the Pilbara craton, which is a Paleoarchean granite-greenstone complex, the age of biotite and feldspar granites is similar to the age of the rocks on the Middle-Dnieper megablock (2.94-2.93 Ga). The difference in magmatism ages may be due to the drift of the different cratons above mantle plumes of different ages.

Keywords: Hannivka granites, Middle-Dnieper Domain, East-Hannivka monocline, craton, Kursk Magnetic Anomaly, U-Pb age.

References:

  1. Artemenko, G.V., Samborskaya, I.A., Gogolev, K.I. and Vysotsky, A.B. (2017), Dopov. Nac. akad. nauk Ukr., Vol. 8, pp. 51-56 [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/dopovidi2017.08.051
  2. Artemenko, G.V., Samborskaya, I.A. and Martynyuk, A.V. (2015), Mineral. Journ. (Ukraine), Vol. 37, No. 2, Kyiv, UA, pp. 76-89 [in Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/mineraljournal.37.02.076
  3. Velikanov, Yu.F. and Velikanova, O.Yu. (2013), Tez. dokl. Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. Granitoidy: usloviya formirovaniya i rudonosnost, Kyiv, 27 maya-1 iyunya 2013, IGMR NAN Ukrainy, Kyiv, pp. 32-33 [in Russian].
  4. Semenenko, N.P. (ed.) (1978), Ferruginous-siliceous formations of the Ukrainian Shield, Vol. 1, Nauk. dumka, Kyiv, UA, 328 p. (p. 15) [in Russian].
  5. Zmievsky, G.E., Paranko, I.S. and Zolotareva, L.I. (1990), Comprehensive geological study of the drilling area of the Krivoy Rog super-deep well (second stage, GIP 2), Survey and mapping team of the Kryvyi Rih GSE, Kryviy Rih, UA [in Russian].
  6. Kulish, E.A., Pokalyuk, V.V., Yatsenko, V.G. and Velikanova, O.Yu. (2008), Volcanizm and sedimentogenesis of the greenstone stage of the Early Precambrian history of Kryvbass, Kyiv, UA, 146 p. [in Russian].
  7. Lashchenko, K.P. and Dubinkina, R.P. (1957), Northern region, in: Geological structure and iron ores of the Kryvyi Rig basin, in Belevtsev, Ya.N. (ed.), Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, pp. 131-142 [in Russian].
  8. Naydenkov, I.V., Derevyankin, Yu.A., Derevyankina, L.F. and Arkhipova, A.A. (1996), Dokl. RAS, Vol. 351, No. 6, pp. 802-805 [in Russian].
  9. Orsa, V.I. (1988), Granite formation in the Precambrian of the Middle Dnieper granite-greenstone region, Nauk. dumka, Kyiv, 204 p. [in Russian].
  10. Ponomarenko, A.N., Lesnaya, I.M., Zyultsle, O.V., Gatsenko, V.A., Dovbush, T.I., Kanunikova, L.I. and Shumlyanskyy, L.V. (2010), Geochemistry and ore formation, Vol. 28, pp. 11-16 [in Russian].
  11. Stepanyuk, L.M., Kurylo, S.I., Bobrov, O.B. and Sergeev, S.A. (2013), Mineral. Journ. (Ukraine), Vol. 35, No. 1, Kyiv, UA, pp. 78-87 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Stepanyuk, L.M., Shumlyanskyy, L.V., Gatsenko, V.O., Lisna, I.M., Dovbush, T.I., Wilde, S.A., Nemchin, A.A., Baginski, B. and Bilan, O.V. (2020), Mineral. Journ. (Ukraine), Vol. 42, No. 3, Kyiv, UA, pp. 50-68 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/mineraljournal.42.03.050 
  13. Sukach, V.V., Kurylo, S.I. and Shurko, M.M. (2014), Geol. Journ., No. 2 (347), Kyiv, UA, pp. 17-28 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.30836/igs.1025-6814.2014.2.138798
  14. Suslova, S.N., Chukhonin, A.P. and Prulutsky, R.E. (1988), Results of geochronological and isotopic studies of rocks according to KSGS. Report "To conduct a comprehensive geological study on the sections of the SGS", Book III, Ch. 7, Krivoy Rog SDW. Min-vo geology of the USSR, VSEGEI, Leningrad, RU [in Russian].
  15. Shumlyanskyy, L.V. (2012), Mineral. Journ. (Ukraine), Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 64-79 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Shcherbak, N.P., Artemenko, G.V., Bartnitsky, E.N., Zmievsky, G.E. and Tatarinova, E.A. (1989), Reps Acad. Sci. UkrSSR, Ser. B, No. 2, pp. 30-35 [in Russian].
  17. Shcherbak, N.P., Artemenko, G.V., Lesnaya, I.M. and Ponomarenko, A.N. (2006), Geochronology of the Early Precambrian of the Ukrainian Shield. Archaean, Nauk. dumka, Kyiv, 321 p. [in Russian].
  18. Claesson, S., Bibikova, E., Shumlyanskyy, L., Dhuime, B. and Hawkesworth, C. (2015), Continent Formation Through Time. Geological Society, in Van Kranendonk, N.M.W., Parman, S., Shirey, S. and Clift, P.D. (eds), London, Spec. Publ., 389, pp. 227-259.
  19. Claesson, S., Bibikova, E.V., Shumlyanskyy, L., Whitehouse, M.J. and Billström, K. (2016), Precam. Res., Vol. 273, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2015.11.002 
  20. Laurent, O., Martin, H., Moyen, J.F. and Doucelance, R. (2014), Lithos, Vol. 205, pp. 208-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2014.06.012 
  21. Middlemost, E.A.K. (1985), Magmas and Magmatic Rocks. An Introduction to Igneous Petrology, Longman Group Ltd., London, New York, 266 p.
  22. Moyen, J.-F., Martin, H., Jayananda, M. and Auvray, B. (2003), Precam. Res., Vol. 127, pp. 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(03)00183-9
  23. Peccerillo, A. and Taylor, S.R. (1976), Contribs Mineral. Petrol., Vol. 58, pp. 63-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00384745 
  24. Shumlyanskyy, L., Wilde, S.A., Nemchin, A.A., Claesson, S., Billström, K. and Bagiński, B. (2021), Precam. Res., 352, 106001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2020.106001 
  25. Sun, S.S. and McDonough, W.F. (1989), Magmatism in the Ocean Basins, in Saunders, A.D. and Norry, M.J. (eds), Geol. Soc. Special Publ., Vol. 42, pp. 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19

PDF

English